Started By
Message

re: What Will Be The Actual Consequences For Ole Miss?

Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by BourreTheDog
Member since May 2016
2564 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Not sure how his testimony will be used......



And this is what has the OleMiss administration scared colorless. Hugh and the boys knew exactly what was going on, from Hugh's days there last time around. It's spread to coaches/administrators at other schools that also served under Hugh while this was going on....

Again, if it's as minor as Bjork has repeatedly boasted, why not release the NOA? Multiple schools, multiple coaches, and multiple offenses. It's not going to be pretty.

If I had to guess, it's going to be along the lines of what USC got, with the added sanction of a pretty serious show cause period for Freeze.
Posted by TampaReb
Member since Aug 2015
1823 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 5:34 pm to
Name one coach that was under Freeze that got into trouble some where else. Saunders and Vaughn where not under Freeze. If Freeze knew about it then why is it reported Freeze isn't even named in the NOA?

The Saunders stuff is not petty it is a issue we have to take serious. Bjork is handling this in a way that he thinks is best for the NCAA and he doesn't care what other fans think. With Bjork saying no LOIC and it reported that no Failure to monitor, Freeze not personally named and not a repeat offender the "hammer" won't be what you want but Bjork has to take this serious and he is.

USC got a LOIC and it is not in the NOA so USC is a stupid comparison and ESPN reported Freeze isn't even named so how does he get a show cause?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter