The post you referenced was because a poster's credibility was shot after the Muschamp-to-USC-DC Rumors last January. Again, the entire fanbase was on board with hiring him as DC Last year, instead of that paint-eating moron Jon Hoke. A good number of people wanted him even with a HCIW stipulation.

Was Muschamp first choice? No. That's common knowledge. Were we happy to get him? No, but we were happy just to be finished with the search. It blew up in Tanner's face like a hand grenade. Most of us know he's in over his head as AD.

That said, as much of a disappointment a hire (on the surface) as Muschamp was, he's done a great job winning people over and assembling a staff.

I have no idea if he'll be successful here. But I do think his personality and attitude are a better fit for this program than someone like Rich Rod is. If you wanted a polarizing hire that would have caused great upheaval, the fanbase was near unanimous in their disdain for that guy.

I'm really not sure what some of you are fishing for. Even if we disagree with the hire and wanted someone else (pretty ubiquitous), it was evident that we had to settle for someone to take the job. So far, he's done well in it.