re: Looks like the Falcons coulda had Gurley and a better DE than Beasley

So now you're just moving the goal posts. First it was a huge tackle difference, but after I school you on why, you now bitch about one-trick pony nonsense.

You clearly have no clue how Quinn's scheme works or how football works in general.

Quinn uses a rotation for a reason. Cliff Avril (the LEO in Seattle), for instance, only played about 768 of their 966 defensive snaps. Because they purposely have different personnel packages for specific situations.

The LEO is very specifically a pass rushing specialist in the 4-3 Under defense that Quinn runs. That doesn't mean Beasley can't play the run or tackle, it's simply not his job in our defense.

And Beasley was throttled back in the first half of the season and slowly began playing more and more snaps. He played 221 in the first 8 games (45%) and 318 in the last 8 games (70%).

Look I know you're butthurt about not getting your way and having the world agree with your hindsight GM game so you can feel smart and glow from the attention, but guys like you who think you can build a team from behind a keyboard after the stats are compiled and act like you saw it all beforehand are just irritating attention whores.

I mean you're already to the point where the success of the team you root for no longer matters. You want so bad to say "I told ya so" just so you can get attention and rub it in people's faces that you're already calling Beasley, Jamal Anderson 2.0. Which is asinine since you can't possibly know if it's accurate. Which means you're just a tool.

Stop being a douche and do something constructive rather than use hyperbole and hindsight to make biased unfounded statements of supposed fact that isn't. All it does is make you look like a whiny bitch.