Started By
Message

re: Looks like the Falcons coulda had Gurley and a better DE than Beasley

Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:07 pm to
Posted by DawgGONIT
Member since May 2015
2961 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

NFL teams that have nice ring collections don't take running backs in the top 10 either.
No shite b/c those top 10 teams had the worst records in the previous seasons, hence why they have the top picks.

Plus how can you say Gurley isn't a top 10 pick? For his rookie contract, and being able to come in a produce right off the rip, is a hella steal.

So only top 10 picks should be qbs then, as those teams w/ the rings usually have a great qb.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 11:08 pm
Posted by SumterCoDawg
Member since Apr 2015
5178 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

No shite b/c those top 10 teams had the worst records in the previous seasons, hence why they have the top picks.
So you're telling me, that bad teams get the better picks in the draft, holy shite, no way! All teams go through rough stretches and have to rebuild and none of them do it by taking a running back in the top ten or even the first round for that matter. Gurley is a great player, probably top 5ish at his position already, but running backs don't have much value because it's so hard to run the ball these days. Hell, Adrian Peterson who is the best at his position had 45 yards in a home playoff game today. Very rare to see a team build completely around a top running back and actually win a lot without having a stud defense and top 10 QB.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter