Started By
Message

re: Altering a contract without a signature

Posted on 12/18/15 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Chavis will argue that the contract is invalid. LSU will say 1. no it isn't; 2. doesn't matter because the alteration took place in 2012 and the contract was modified with the consent of Chavis in 2013.

2013 agreement is legally binding. Chavis breached. Summary Judgment, LSU wins. aTm cuts a check to LSU.


Case settled long before that. Chavis sympathizers declare victory.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81237 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 2:25 pm to
Don't underestimate the pettiness on both sides.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Case settled long before that. Chavis sympathizers declare victory.


Maybe, but I don't think so. These LSU lawyers are on salary and have got nothing but time.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34356 posts
Posted on 12/18/15 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Case settled long before that. Chavis sympathizers declare victory.



The only way it get settled early is if Les gets fired before its all done.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter