re: Altering a contract without a signature

quote:

---

Here is how it's going to play out. 1. Chavis is going to release his phone records (already happened); 2. The phone records will reveal he was negotiating his employment with aTm before the Music City Bowl, which 3. constitutes a breach of his contract with LSU, and 4. means Chavis is liable to LSU for the liquidated damages layed out in the contract.

---

First of all, "layed?" lol

Secondly the phone records are fricking METADATA. Verizon doesn't have a fricking transcript that can tell the court exactly what was said, just who talked to who IF the number can be traced back to a phone tied to Texas A&M (which I would doubt).

Here is how it's going to play out: 1. The phone records will reveal at worst that MAYBE Chavis did something wrong, but it won't prove the point either way 2. The judge, pissed that the two sides are wasting his time on a case that should be settled, and the fact that at some level both sides are in the wrong, will rule from the bench that Chavis has to to pay a reduced buyout 3. I am going to bump this thread and call you an idiot for dealing in absolutes.

Bookmark this post.