If we lose Eason over this, I will have a sad "I told you so". We should have given Richt another year with Pruitt and a QB and some seasoned talent, and a nice recruiting class.

Now we have a novice HC, may be losing our best DC ever (sorry Russell), missing out on our next DC selection, and who knows about our OC. Plus one of the best QB recruits in years who was all ready to move on campus in month is in the wind.

With all this excitement, I am starting to get that feeling that we took a wrong turn. And I am a Disney!

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by runningdog

Dawg Nation

Member since Jan 2011

798 posts

Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:01 pm to Broncothor

And yet we would have still ended up 9-3 every year with a string of stupid arse losses. Get your Disney self on the Smart train as you are sounding more like a negadawg

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgGONIT

Member since May 2015

2961 posts

Posted on 12/3/15 at 7:13 pm to Broncothor

quote:
If we lose Eason over this, I will have a sad "I told you so". We should have given Richt another year with Pruitt and a QB and some seasoned talent, and a nice recruiting class.

Why can't you see Richt is the problem? Richt is in charge, so he gets the blame and all the credit. But how can Richt not have an SEC caliber qb after Murray? Even if Richt was here Eason would be the 3rd year after Murray w/ 3 different starters as the qb, not to mention he is a true freshman.

Then what will you say after next season's 9 wins with Richt? "We gotta give him another year or two with Eason. Just wait until Eason is an upperclassman."