re: The Richt apologists are firmly seated on the wrong side of history

quote:

---

I'm not sure what your angle is. Nobody is privy to the specific Xs and Os of Saban or Meyer or what they do to prepare teams. We know they get consistent results on the field and Richt does not, which is how most people base their decisions. Results. Are you trying to imply that there is no link between Sabans strategies and the W's he earns?

---

I do think there's at least a partial link between Saban's strategies and his wins, however what I'm asking for is specifics, because Saban isn't some magical football fairy that waves a wand and wins ball games. If Saban is doing something (or many thing) right and Richt is doing those things wrong, I want to know (or at least have the administration know) so we can improve. I don't think getting someone different will magically make us better. It has to be the right person with the right approach to football, and the right approach would have to be "better" than Richts. How do we know what will be better if we don't take the time to figure out what Richt's doing wrong?