Started By
Message
re: SECW Def Stats
Posted on 10/19/15 at 12:52 pm to SoberAg
Posted on 10/19/15 at 12:52 pm to SoberAg
Question so I don't have to start a new thread about it:
Do you non-aggys feel that the defense played better from the 2nd quarter on?
I'm not talking LSU-Bama quality, but they did look physical enough to hang in the SEC to me.
We had good pressure up front (the injury to Bama's center helped), and our safety and CB play looked improved. I won't mention the LBs because for some parts of the game I'm pretty sure they weren't on the field.
Do you non-aggys feel that the defense played better from the 2nd quarter on?
I'm not talking LSU-Bama quality, but they did look physical enough to hang in the SEC to me.
We had good pressure up front (the injury to Bama's center helped), and our safety and CB play looked improved. I won't mention the LBs because for some parts of the game I'm pretty sure they weren't on the field.
2
Posted on 10/19/15 at 12:56 pm to SoberAg
quote:
Do you non-aggys feel that the defense played better from the 2nd quarter on?
I'm not talking LSU-Bama quality, but they did look physical enough to hang in the SEC to me.
No how do none of you realize that Kelly went down and thats the only reason your d got any pressure or stopped the run sorta.
Posted on 10/19/15 at 1:00 pm to SoberAg
quote:
Do you non-aggys feel that the defense played better from the 2nd quarter on?
I'm not talking LSU-Bama quality, but they did look physical enough to hang in the SEC to me.
quote:
The problem was our QB threw 3 TD's to Bama Defensive Backs. That's important because a defense usually gets worse as the game goes on in a physical matchup but A&M got better.
3 pick sixes means your defense got three possessions off. your defense was barely on the field in the first half, so they should have been pretty fresh in the second half
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News