re: How do you compare these schedules through 6 games?

quote:

---

no not really at all, you perceive this because of bias

---

So if a panel of experts were to decide which of these was harder:

Wisconsin (neutral), MTSU, OM, @UGa, Arkansas

@MSU, AU, @Syr, EMich, SC

you honestly think it'd be evenly split? It's not even close.

quote:

---

What? might want to look in the mirror. You are the one talking about comparing teams from other conferences as to your reasoning

---

My argument this entire time has been that alabama is better than lsu based on both resumes so far. That's it. Then you said "if lsu wins a championship, they aren't better than bama?" Cmon man. We aren't talking about IF lsu wins a chapmionships, we're talking about who is better based on the first 6 games.

quote:

---

You diminished how good they are because they rely on a RB to win.

---

Yeah, that's called common sense. Bama has proven to have a good D, good RBs, and an inconsistent but capable passing game. LSU has proven (against lesser competition) to have a good D, medicore passing, and relies copmletely on their stud RB. Almost half their total yards are by 1 guy.

quote:

---

And which team is better as of now? Which team has an SEC loss? ...

---

Dude, LSU has played MSU, AU, and SC from the SEC. Bama has palyed OM, UGA, and Arkansas.

I know you aren't stupid, you're usually solid, why are you being dense today?