Started By
Message
re: Interesting Read re: CIA involvement in "cover-up" of JFK assassination
Posted on 10/12/15 at 2:04 pm to Kentucker
Posted on 10/12/15 at 2:04 pm to Kentucker
There is no logic in any of that. There are made up assertions. They don't address anything in my previous posts.
Should I believe some Dudes on the internet who obviously have done no research, not even read the links I provided, or the former President of The United States who flat out said it was a conspiracy?
Should I believe some Dudes on the internet who obviously have done no research, not even read the links I provided, or the former President of The United States who flat out said it was a conspiracy?
1
Posted on 10/12/15 at 2:16 pm to Tropic Lightning
Your mistake is assuming that just because someone believes Oswald acted they must not be well informed or have not researched the topic.
Like those who deny evolution on this site, rather than futilely trying to convince you of that which you have no desire to believe I will simply show you the path and allow you to choose what to do, thereby not wasting my time or yours:
LINK
Again, long story short there is only one theory which does not require leaps of logic and assumptions based on facts not in evidence. The burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorist.
Like those who deny evolution on this site, rather than futilely trying to convince you of that which you have no desire to believe I will simply show you the path and allow you to choose what to do, thereby not wasting my time or yours:
LINK
Again, long story short there is only one theory which does not require leaps of logic and assumptions based on facts not in evidence. The burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorist.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News