Started By
Message

re: Florida wouldn't take Ukwuachu Transfer

Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:55 pm to
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

But Baylor knew, at most, what Boise knew. Possibly less.

If people are claiming that that should have been enough for Briles to have passed on him, why, then, is Petersen not complicit in this?


Briles had a duty to Baylor students, and Peterson to Boise students. Peterson got rid of the guy.

Briles appeared to fail both in finding out about the guy, and in acting when the guy was charged.

I think that what comes of this may be that schools like Boise might have their duty to provide information clarified, but no matter how you slice it, Peterson didn't have the same responsibility to Baylor students as Briles has.
Posted by ChiTownBammer
South Florida
Member since Aug 2014
1130 posts
Posted on 8/25/15 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Peterson didn't have the same responsibility to Baylor students as Briles has.


Didn't say it was the same responsibility, just that Petersen might have been complicit.

I just think it's funny that Petersen is trying so hard to convince people he told Briles everything without realizing that, if he truly did, it makes them both look like scumbags.

Sounds to me like Petersen told him the bare minimum to cover his arse and still manage to dump the kid somewhere else.
This post was edited on 8/25/15 at 6:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter