Started By
Message

re: Chubbs vs Fournette

Posted on 8/19/15 at 9:38 am to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44277 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 9:38 am to
quote:

No, not really potential, just better. Gurley, when healthy, was widely and almost unanimously considered the best back in football.


I agree that he was the most talented back, by a slight margin. However, that wasn't based on production because Gordon outstripped him by a wide margin. So what would you say it was based on?
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26176 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 9:52 am to
quote:

However, that wasn't based on production because Gordon outstripped him by a wide margin.


Because Todd missed large portions of the 2013 and 2014 seasons.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33143 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 9:58 am to
quote:

quote:
No, not really potential, just better. Gurley, when healthy, was widely and almost unanimously considered the best back in football.

I agree that he was the most talented back, by a slight margin. However, that wasn't based on production because Gordon outstripped him by a wide margin. So what would you say it was based on?


Check out the September (1st 5 games) stats from last year. They were neck and neck until gurley was forced off the field, so your point isnt as strong as you think it is.
This post was edited on 8/19/15 at 10:07 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter