Started By
Message
re: Future GOATs hit the practice field
Posted on 8/10/15 at 10:16 pm to RB10
Posted on 8/10/15 at 10:16 pm to RB10
I don't get where the notion that Anthony Johnson was lazy comes from. He was not taught properly and was not played to his strengths.
Maybe in a 3-4 but not in Chavis' scheme. You seriously don't understand. It's a 4-3 defense with two-gap responsibility. It makes no sense. If Mack can turn into a Brockers, maybe he'll be successful, but Brockers was a 6'6 330lb monster. I don't remember Chavis being successful with short DTs.
quote:
But 6'1 330 pound interior DLmen are pluggers.
Maybe in a 3-4 but not in Chavis' scheme. You seriously don't understand. It's a 4-3 defense with two-gap responsibility. It makes no sense. If Mack can turn into a Brockers, maybe he'll be successful, but Brockers was a 6'6 330lb monster. I don't remember Chavis being successful with short DTs.
This post was edited on 8/10/15 at 10:18 pm
1
Posted on 8/10/15 at 10:31 pm to rmnldr
quote:
I don't get where the notion that Anthony Johnson was lazy comes from. He was not taught properly and was not played to his strengths.
Because plenty of other Dlinemen improved over time under Brick. He was no guru, but he wasn't terrible at developing talent.
It's simple, Mack could be Drake Nevis circa 2010 or he could be Anyhony Johnson circa 2013. His work ethic will determine which it will be.
Also, saying the DT play at LSU under Chavis was anything other than good is just plain wrong. 2013 was the worst year and it was still adequate. Hell, last year LSU started and RS and true freshman in the middle and by season's end they were playing some good football.
This post was edited on 8/10/15 at 10:33 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News