Started By
Message
re: Fall Camp Thread
Posted on 8/16/15 at 8:31 am to the808bass
Posted on 8/16/15 at 8:31 am to the808bass
quote:
I'm not advocating a controversy. There's no way you can throw a FR in at QB for Mizzou IMO. Especially with Mauk's experience.
If Lock is the better option why should seniority or experience play a role here? The idea that we should let a below 60% passer, who also may have reached his ceiling for potential, continue to run our offense is mind boggling to me. I may be in the minority here but I personally think Mauk has the potential to lose us 2 games this year.
When your QB coach tells Pete Scantlebury after the scrimmage that Mauk has not taken a step forward or a step back and that he still has to show more consistency that's an issue when you are in your 4th year in the program.
1
Posted on 8/16/15 at 9:12 am to countrygrammar
You could sense Hill was frustrated with Maty's performance. No doubt.
I was one to say it was crazy for anyone to suggest Lock would play. It still is. It's only one scrimmage and Pinkel just is not one to replace a returning starter. You also have to think if Lock would start by some crazy reason then all of these guys are going to transfer out and we would be fricked.
If it continues down this path though. Maybe there is a decision to be made, but I still highly doubt it.
I was one to say it was crazy for anyone to suggest Lock would play. It still is. It's only one scrimmage and Pinkel just is not one to replace a returning starter. You also have to think if Lock would start by some crazy reason then all of these guys are going to transfer out and we would be fricked.
If it continues down this path though. Maybe there is a decision to be made, but I still highly doubt it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News