Started By
Message

re: Is it time for 9 conference games?

Posted on 8/2/15 at 2:04 am to
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36155 posts
Posted on 8/2/15 at 2:04 am to
quote:

Well, having an odd number of teams in each division means there's going to have to be at least one cross-divisional game at a neutral site



Correct.

Even if you mandated that every SEC team must play a neutral site game you'd have to make that an opposite division opponent to make it the same for every team in the division.

Unless Florida/UGA are moved to opposite divisions that doesn't seem plausible.

I still like the idea of the roommate switch proposal with the four pods that recombine every two years to make two divisions. Failing that, the next best solution is to get rid of the fixed opposite division opponents (if your objective is to rotate through the opposite division in a reasonable time period). Keeping fixed opponents with 8 or 9 conference games means you take a very long time to get through the other six East/West teams.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17289 posts
Posted on 8/2/15 at 7:43 am to
I'd be in favor of 9 SEC games plus Louisville and saaaaay Western Kentucky and Marshall. Would like to see us rotate Indiana or Memphis on there too. We just added Southern Miss for 16-17.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29270 posts
Posted on 8/2/15 at 7:58 am to
quote:

get rid of the fixed opposite division opponents
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter