Started By
Message

re: Pac12 south harder than SEC west?

Posted on 7/29/15 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by knight_ryder
XTC cabaret
Member since Jan 2015
3356 posts
Posted on 7/29/15 at 2:24 pm to
Yeah but considering the amount of blue chip recruits the west has year in and year out I would say the west is ahead of the curve. Now that the CFP is here a 2 loss West team would have way more credibility over a Pac12 south team.
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 7/29/15 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Yeah but considering the amount of blue chip recruits the west has year in and year out I would say the west is ahead of the curve. Now that the CFP is here a 2 loss West team would have way more credibility over a Pac12 south team.


Sure is a good thing that recruiting rankings count in games....Missouri is example #1 that recruiting rankings don't mean anything.

I've admitted that the West was better at the top and bottom...but I'd give the middle to the PAC.

Teams with 9+ wins
SECW - 3/7
PACS- 5/6

SEC played 8 conference games, while PAC plays 9. Considering most people's non-con schedules...all things equal, the SEC should average one more win.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter