Started By
Message

re: Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)

Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:54 am to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34353 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Don't you bring that shite into this thread!



Why not? Pods make the most sense in a 16 team configuration.

By having pods you ensure that all teams plays each other, and that future unbalance in conference power can be partially balanced through creative scheduling. Pods also allow for a playoff system within the conference that can increase the prestige of the SEC winner in regards to the greater college football playoffs.

Obviously the SEC at 14 teams is kinda unwieldy. With pods the schools would play every other school in their pod and then face two other schools from the other pods (with those two teams from the other pod rotating every two years, so there would be home and away games) to form a 9-game conference schedule. Obviously nine games is another hurdle.....


I will just stop there. I hate pod talk too. But I swear to God if you ever triple bump this shitty thread again I will write a multi-post essay on pods so mind numbingly boring that it will make your children will be born with narcolepsy. I know you think you trolled the shite out of us or something when in reality all you did is piss off the cardboardboxer by posting the most inane realignment thread ever on this board.

Just let it die.
This post was edited on 7/10/15 at 9:56 am
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Why not? Pods make the most sense in a 16 team configuration.


gawd dammit.....
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7392 posts
Posted on 7/10/15 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

cardboardboxer
Best Plan Ever to Maximize SEC $$ in the Future (Realignment/Expansion)

quote:
Don't you bring that shite into this thread!



Why not? Pods make the most sense in a 16 team configuration.

By having pods you ensure that all teams plays each other, and that future unbalance in conference power can be partially balanced through creative scheduling. Pods also allow for a playoff system within the conference that can increase the prestige of the SEC winner in regards to the greater college football playoffs.

Obviously the SEC at 14 teams is kinda unwieldy. With pods the schools would play every other school in their pod and then face two other schools from the other pods (with those two teams from the other pod rotating every two years, so there would be home and away games) to form a 9-game conference schedule. Obviously nine games is another hurdle.....


I will just stop there. I hate pod talk too. But I swear to God if you ever triple bump this shitty thread again I will write a multi-post essay on pods so mind numbingly boring that it will make your children will be born with narcolepsy. I know you think you trolled the shite out of us or something when in reality all you did is piss off the cardboardboxer by posting the most inane realignment thread ever on this board.

Just let it die.



(S)He is just upset because, as you pointed out, if you do 2-8 team divisions he thinks the schedule would be better! As if people aren't b'ing enough about 2-7 team divisions.

& I still think the SEC WOULD keep cross-division games through the end of time.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter