Started By
Message

re: Alabama Governor Bentley has Confederate flags removed from Capitol grounds

Posted on 6/24/15 at 4:42 pm to
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 6/24/15 at 4:42 pm to
Slavery was more the catalyst that provoked the bigger issue of state's rights for most southerners. It's not that southerners just hated black and wanted to keep them enslaved. It was that they didn't want some politicians from another part of the country making a decision that had such a big effect on their economy. At the time the southern economy was based almost entirely on agriculture driven by slavery.

Most were morally opposed to slavery and saw the evil in it, but thought it necessary to the economy. 99% of slaves were owned by the richest 1% of the population. So most southerners didn't personally own any slaves, or if they did they were more of a house servant then out in the fields picking cotton and getting whipped. But even for those that didn't own a slave, the industry still supported everybody.

They wanted to come to that moral conclusion to end it themselves, instead of being told by somebody who had never set foot south of DC. If left to their own devices to deal with human rights on their own, as the rest of the world was at that time, I imagine there would have been less violence and anger about it and likely less lingering resentment and hate in the long run.




By no means am I typing this in supports of slavery, I'm just trying to provide insight into the line of thinking in the south at the time.
It turns out they were right about the economy as it took over 100 years for the south to recover in that regard. Now we can look back and plainly see that 100 years of poverty is better than even more day of keeping another human in chains, but you can also how that could be a scary and uncertain thing to look ahead to for the future of your family.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/24/15 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

99% of slaves were owned by the richest 1% of the population


This is not entirely accurate. Slave ownership by household was around 50% in some Southern states, and averaged around 35%.

quote:

They wanted to come to that moral conclusion to end it themselves, instead of being told by somebody who had never set foot south of DC. If left to their own devices to deal with human rights on their own, as the rest of the world was at that time, I imagine there would have been less violence and anger about it and likely less lingering resentment and hate in the long run.



Do you have anything to support this? I do think many Southerners struggled with the morality of slavery, but there was also a lot of money invested in it. And it was pretty much the only driver of the Southern economy at the time. I don't think the voluntary conclusion of it would have been as quickly and peaceful as you suggest. Just look at how far into the 1950's and 60's the Jim Crow laws extended to. And those took multiple Supreme Court decisions and Federal laws to unravel.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter