Started By
Message
re: We should let Auburn run to the East
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:45 pm to auburnphan23
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:45 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Only bammer tards would refuse to play someone and then talk about how much they would have won if the game was played.
Auburn was the school who pressed for the Iron Bowl to be resumed. Bammer is the school who fought against resuming the game until they were pressured by the Alabama legislature
Only a sorry hick auNeck would brag about 73 years of "dominance" and not mention that the two teams didn't play for 40 of those years. Not only that, but a 40 year period in which Alabama excelled.
Only a pitiful person needing validation from big brother would suggest that certain coaches records be disallowed when calculating the wins and losses in the series.
auNeck FantastyLand version of their "dominance":
Xen Scott - Did not compete
Wallace Wade - Did not compete
Frank Thomas - Did not compete
Bear Bryant - Don't count his wins
Gene Stallings - Don't count his wins
Nick Saban - Don't count his wins.
The conclusion, in auNeckery logic, is that they are an overall better team. Bammers just been lucky to have good coaches, at times, and that doesn't really count.
Does that about sum it up? I think it does and that type of attitude also sums up why so many different fanbases get a bad vibe from the fambly cult down dere in Opelika.
1
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:58 pm to Alert Mi
Only a bammer tard would ignore that the Iron Bowl was cancelled in 1907 and Auburn continued to be the superior team up until the early 1920's which is half or close to half of the time the game was discontinued.
A bammer tard is also the only person who would ignore the fact that even a former student trainer on their own football team during the late 1920's and early 1930's claims bammers rise to power during that time was at least partially fueled by starting their well established tradition of paying players, recruiting dozens or hundreds of players that were functionally illiterate, and basically doing anything else it took to win
A bammer tard is also the only person who would ignore the fact that even a former student trainer on their own football team during the late 1920's and early 1930's claims bammers rise to power during that time was at least partially fueled by starting their well established tradition of paying players, recruiting dozens or hundreds of players that were functionally illiterate, and basically doing anything else it took to win
This post was edited on 6/18/15 at 2:01 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News