re: We should let Auburn run to the East

Hooked and gaffed

quote:

---

Another ignorant Bama fan. Tennessee has never led Alabama in the all time series for any meaningful amount of time. Auburn however lead the Iron bowl against Alabama for 60+ years. It took Alabama all the way until 1965 to take the lead for the first time in their history. That's right, the first time in the Iron Bowl's history - 73 years man. Your current lead rests upon 9 straight wins during the 70's. You have only been better than Auburn for 20 years in your entire history from about 1961-1981. If it weren't for Bryant, you'd still be sucking our tail pipes. Before Bryant showed up Auburn led the series and after he passed, Auburn has once against resumed command. Since 1982 Bryant's last year Alabama's record vs. Auburn in the Iron Bowl is 15-18. But, hey we're not relevant. I guess I know why you feel that way now. Enjoy the Bryant years, it was the only time in your history when you were better than your daddy Auburn.

The best TN has ever done was take a brief one game lead against Alabama in 1960. It was short lived

Your fear, I smell it.

---

This kind of circular cow fricking logic is why auNecks are despised by normal people.

The Fain (done losted my pants in the lake while drunk off my arse hanging around other men naked) Die Tigers are a miserable bunch of cherry picking clowns.

auNecks had a mere 4 game lead in the overall series before Bryant's arrival. Of course, while Bryant was the coach, for 25 seasons, he just annihilated the team you support and made all of you into what you are today, sniveling counts. His overall record against the auNecks was 19-6.

Yet, here you are, asking Alabama fans to enjoy Bryant's period of dominance because it's the only thing that makes Alabama better than the Fain Dies.

Well, it was a 25 year fricking period, you amazing dumb-arse. In reality, what you are asking posters here to do is to disallow a 25 year period in Alabama's history, and then judge the two teams.

Wow. Why are all of you so, so stupid? The dicing up of time periods, in so many fanciful ways to gain a statistical advantage, is just fricking sad, auNeck. Everyone looks at your types and feel pity for you as football fans.

Hey, I have another idea. Let's forget that Alabama has won the last 5 out of 7 games with Saban at the helm. Disallow Saban's tenure also.

In fact, disallow all our really great coaches to get a better statistical average. Oh wait, that is really what you are doing anyway, isn't it?

Did you forget to include that during the years 1907-1947, Alabama and the auNecks didn't play? Alabama had three of it's best coaches during this period in Xen Scott, Wallace Wade, and Frank Thomas. Alabama's record during this period was 271-75-22--0.766. The auNecks record during this same time period was (202-138-24)--0.588

You skeezy bastards are lucky you didn't play Alabama during this period or you would probably be down 30-35 extra games.

Let's review auNeck logic. If they can remove from the record books all of Bama's greatest coaches, which is what basically happened with Scott and Wade and Thomas, and also not have Bryant's or Saban's record against them count, they are ahead.

In only 21 measly games between 1892 and 1957, before Bryant's arrival, the auNecks led the series by a mere 3 games,(9-12-1)--0.43182, missing out on a deadly dominant period of Alabama's history.

Don't pity them, everyone, just hate them for what they are. I have much more respect for a team like Tennessee. They did it the hard way and fought the hard fights against the best we had to offer and still came out looking pretty damn good.