Started By
Message
re: "If we counted championships like bammer does" - here's how many your team has
Posted on 6/16/15 at 7:54 am to CrimsonBoz
Posted on 6/16/15 at 7:54 am to CrimsonBoz
back in the '70s or '80s whenever it was that whoever it was that actually started the whole keeping up with the number of championships at bama. when he sat down and started looking at this i have to think he stuck '41 in as a needle to everybody else. you know a 'gotcha' kind of thing. obviously i have no idea nor have i ever seen an interview with him. but seriously, he had to be lol'ing every time he heard a comment about it.
now,to the argument about cfdwh vs ncaa site. if memory serves me right. about 6-7 years ago they went in the ncaa site and deleted a lot of the awarded championships. here again that memory thing, i think the ncaa site basically mirrored the cfdwh site. but somebody didnt like it so it got changed.
to me the only fair way is to include every single awarded nc for every single team. anything other than that means you are picking and choosing which always leads to bias. welp thats my 2cents worth.
to the op, great job man.
now,to the argument about cfdwh vs ncaa site. if memory serves me right. about 6-7 years ago they went in the ncaa site and deleted a lot of the awarded championships. here again that memory thing, i think the ncaa site basically mirrored the cfdwh site. but somebody didnt like it so it got changed.
to me the only fair way is to include every single awarded nc for every single team. anything other than that means you are picking and choosing which always leads to bias. welp thats my 2cents worth.
to the op, great job man.
This post was edited on 6/16/15 at 7:56 am
Posted on 6/16/15 at 9:14 am to crimsontater
quote:
now,to the argument about cfdwh vs ncaa site. if memory serves me right. about 6-7 years ago they went in the ncaa site and deleted a lot of the awarded championships. here again that memory thing, i think the ncaa site basically mirrored the cfdwh site. but somebody didnt like it so it got changed.
to me the only fair way is to include every single awarded nc for every single team. anything other than that means you are picking and choosing which always leads to bias. welp thats my 2cents worth.
I'm not really sure about the history of the NCAA website. The premise of this thread was based around how everyone jokes about Bama claiming National Championships for anything for any reason (even though 1941 is really the only year we did that for). So, for fun I wanted to compile a list of every selector for every team throughout each team's entire history. For that purpose, CFBDW serves this thread a little better, IMO - because it includes pretty much every random selector imaginable.
quote:
to the op, great job man.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News