Started By
Message

re: True of False? (ISIS thread)

Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:21 am to
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35654 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:21 am to
quote:

we had better have an alternative source available.



We already do. It's called Nuclear. The next step is figuring out how to do hydrogen fuel cells in cars without the need to store tanks of hydrogen in the car.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:27 am to
quote:

It's called Nuclear


No
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 10:28 am to
quote:

We already do. It's called Nuclear. The next step is figuring out how to do hydrogen fuel cells in cars without the need to store tanks of hydrogen in the car.


I'm really hoping that Nuclear scientists can figure out the fusion process, without destroying us of course. Fission is efficient, but creates a lot of toxic waste, and is still pretty dangerous. Nuclear waste must be dealt with in a safe way.
Posted by hipgnosis
Member since Mar 2015
1226 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 11:42 am to
Alcohol used to be seen as a good fuel source.

But it was easily decentrizesd -- making it impossible to monopolize.

And the first Model T was built with and to run on hemp.

There have always been alternatives, all better than nuclear, but the powers that be pushes us into and have kept us in the current petro paradigm.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter