Started By
Message

re: Definitive ranking of SEC-era basketball programs

Posted on 4/13/15 at 8:05 pm to
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 4/13/15 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

you should give points for making the tourney, elite 8's and sweet 16's.

No hardware.

quote:

SEC tourney titles and regular season/division titles are retarded.

Hardware.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3170 posts
Posted on 4/13/15 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Hardware.


Valid point. If teams are awarded points for anything but achievements like team trophies, where do you stop and draw the line? Some have suggested points for each round of the NCAA's...but that hurts teams from the era that couldn't qualify when only one team per conference was allowed in. Also, some SEC teams have turned down automatic bids to the NCAA's--should they get a point for at least qualifying? And should points be awarded for teams that go to the NIT too? For every round advanced in the SEC tournament as well? For positions in the AP Poll? For the number of Players-of-the-Year produced? The line has to be drawn somewhere.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter