Started By
Message
re: SEC now all counting independents as P5 games
Posted on 3/19/15 at 1:28 pm to kilo
Posted on 3/19/15 at 1:28 pm to kilo
quote:
You are a complete moron. You are moving the argument as you go to try and cover your bullshite.
I'm not moving shite.
This is a thread about scheduling. My original statement was that Army is no worse than the bottom feeders of the P5 conferences, which is a fact when is comes to who is on the schedule. Army = Kansas, ISU, Wake Forest, etc. IN TERMS OF SCHEDULING. I'm sorry you and a few other are too dumb to realize what I was talking about.
In any evert, why would I argue that Army is as good a football team as those others? Football is about 5th on this list of priorities to those boys.
2
Posted on 3/19/15 at 1:33 pm to RB10
quote:
This is a thread about scheduling. My original statement was that Army is no worse than the bottom feeders of the P5 conferences, which is a fact when is comes to who is on the schedule. Army = Kansas, ISU, Wake Forest, etc. IN TERMS OF SCHEDULING. I'm sorry you and a few other are too dumb to realize what I was talking about.
Nope. This is a nice attempt to move the "goal posts" but you were talking about competitive level when you originally brought up the notion that bottom P5 teams were equal to Army. That was then and is now complete bullshite. No one in this thread is buying your nonsense.
Posted on 3/19/15 at 1:34 pm to RB10
quote:
In any evert, why would I argue that Army is as good a football team as those others?
I dont know, why did you?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News