Started By
Message

re: I want God to be real.

Posted on 1/18/15 at 11:44 pm to
Posted by beejon
University Of Louisiana Warhawks
Member since Nov 2008
7959 posts
Posted on 1/18/15 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

Correct, now explain how you know that the universe did not begin as a product of natural processes.


If one is claiming that the universe was created from nothing by nothing, then the burden of proof is to offer evidence that such a creative occurrence is a natural occurrence.

Contrarily, if one is claiming that the universe was created by a natural occurrence from something, then the burden of proof would be to identify the natural source for the something from which the universe was created.

Anything less would be introducing supernatural creation.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 1/18/15 at 11:51 pm to
quote:

If one is claiming that the universe was created from nothing by nothing, then the burden of proof is to offer evidence that such a creative occurrence is a natural occurrence.


He didn't claim that it did happen that way, he claimed that you have to prove that it did not or could not have happened that way.

Right now, the question is agnostic as in: It cannot be known at this time or there is no evidence.

You are saying that it was caused by something supernatural, therefore it must be proven or you must provide evidence that there is something supernatural.

If it is outside of the "natural world", then how can you measure it? Could you ever prove it? Is your position reliant only on your faith that it is true?

We're saying we don't know, you're saying you do.

And doing a very bad job at arguing, which is kind of why William Lane Craig lost all credibility a while back.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 1/19/15 at 12:07 am to
quote:

If one is claiming that the universe was created from nothing by nothing, then the burden of proof is to offer evidence that such a creative occurrence is a natural occurrence.

Contrarily, if one is claiming that the universe was created by a natural occurrence from something, then the burden of proof would be to identify the natural source for the something from which the universe was created.

Anything less would be introducing supernatural creation.


First, I never said it happened that way. I was illustrating the absurdity of claiming the universe must exist due to a supernatural cause. The fact is that you believe it has a supernatural cause, and that there is no other possible explanation, because you lack both the desire and the knowledge to believe anything else.

Second, and this goes back to you lacking the knowledge most likely due to a lack of pursuit for obvious reasons, there are widely held ideas in the field of astrophysics about "nothing coming from nothing" as an explanation for existence.

In what I believe is a futile attempt to educate, I offer you this:

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter