re: 2016 UGA Recruiting Thread (commits, offers, visits, etc.)

quote:

---

Eason CLEARLY, ABSOLUTELY, NO frickING DOUBT ABOUT IT, has the better arm strength.

---

And that's not debatable. He does. That's just not my point. Arm strength isn't everything when evaluating a qb. Patterson has very good arm strength. Eason has great arm strength. Patterson is very good at creating plays from nothing, Eason isn't as much as of a creative quarterback. Patterson shows he doesn't lose much when throwing on the run or from awkward angles. Eason shows incredible touch and poise in the pocket.

So do you see where I'm getting at? To say Eason is the better prospect is fine. No issues with that because it probably is true. But to say it isn't close is pretty foolish.