Started By
Message

re: Defensive fundamentals or scheme: what are you more excited for?

Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:54 am to
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12134 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Fundamentals. It wasn't Johnson's 4-2-5 that failed but the implementation. 4-2-5 is alive and well all over the country and run by some of the most successful defenses



I couldn't agree more. The 4-2-5 is a great scheme concept that is really flexible but our defense seriously lacks discipline and fundamentals and has since Chizik took over. I am just hoping that Muschamp instills discipline and has our defense taking good angles and form tackling. Would be great to see again.
Posted by atlau
Member since Oct 2012
5264 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 9:56 am to
But hasn't the 4-2-5 been criticized because NFL typically runs either a 3-4 or a 4-3 thus not appealing to recruits whose ultimate goal is the NFL?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter