Started By
Message

re: With 14 teams, the Big 6 should admit a 7th

Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:56 am to
Posted by Tigerjackswartz
Member since Mar 2012
322 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission


I see what you are saying. So when a team finally busts through and wins an SECCG (most likely candidate being Mizzou, since they are the only non-Big 6 team making the game lately), they will go into a new category - kind of like a limbo or purgatory - where they aren't admitted to Big 6 heaven, but have transcended from the Little 8 Hell.

I like it. We have a plan.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19267 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

quote:
I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission


I see what you are saying. So when a team finally busts through and wins an SECCG (most likely candidate being Mizzou, since they are the only non-Big 6 team making the game lately), they will go into a new category - kind of like a limbo or purgatory - where they aren't admitted to Big 6 heaven, but have transcended from the Little 8 Hell.

I like it. We have a plan.



No. Then the goal posts would become multiples of whatever barrier was crossed.

SEC Championships, then National Championships, then some other qualifier.

Rinse, lather, repeat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter