Started By
Message
re: With 14 teams, the Big 6 should admit a 7th
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:52 am to Cheese Grits
Posted on 12/11/14 at 8:52 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
Yeah, because you would feel the dominance of the Dores!
0 NC 2 Southern Con titles....11 SIAA
Posted on 12/11/14 at 9:39 am to KajunGator
I think the idea of the Big Six originated in late 80's or early 90's b/c at that time there were only six programs that had recently won SEC championships in football. As others have mentioned, last non Big Six SEC champs were Kentucky in 1976 (co-champs) and Ole Miss in 1963.
Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).
The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.
I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.
It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.
Interestingly enough 25 years later it is the exact same 6 teams that have won the SECCG (all multiple times).
The SECCG has become something of a line of demarcation (esp since it coincided w/ the first expansion), so some people prob consider Big Six to mean exclusively things that occurred in SECCG era.
I think if another team wins the SECCG the majority of people on this board would start using some kind of designator, but not assign full "Big" status. For example Big Six + 1. If that teams wins multiple SECCGs or NCs, then they would get full admission.
It would be interesting to see if the majority of people tried to kick another school out, or just expand it to Big Seven.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News