Started By
Message
re: Let me get this straight...
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:04 am to Jagd Tiger
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:04 am to Jagd Tiger
Jagd, it's not any different, but it's not as good as what the BCS did imo. There were many inputs when the BCS ran the show. That's why I said it has set it back several years, back to before the BCS.
2
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:39 am to eatatjoes
quote:Whoa there. I agree that the committee proved itself to be a farce from the very first rankings it released, and it's a joke that a system created to decide a champion based on head-to-head ignores that aspect when determining which teams play head-to-head; but to say this committee equals pre-BCS is blasphemy.
That's why I said it has set it back several years, back to before the BCS.
The pre-BCS era of college football will go down in history as its most glorious. It's what attracted the big-money cockroaches in the first place.
Unfortunately, like every other sport out there, big money is raping the purity of it.
Such is life.
This committe, and the playoffs, were created for nothing more than a tighter control on this big-money-making business, PERIOD.
It's about money. It's ALWAYS about money.
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:45 am to eatatjoes
quote:
. There were many inputs when the BCS ran the show.
doesn't make them better though, sure ask a sports writer if he's eminently more qualified than the average person walking down the street, and 98% will tell you they are, and 97% of those are delusional.
yes this system may "stink" but you still haven't offered any evidence it will stink any worse than the BCS did.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News