Started By
Message

re: Is Texas A&M the biggest "little brother" of them all?

Posted on 11/6/14 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
16262 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 12:09 pm to
quote:


I don't really agree. Yes, UT is glad to be rid of them and it's clear as to why.
Aggies may want you to believe they are happy to be gone and they were at first. However, they are still very bitter from what I can see. Especially since they got slapped back down to reality.

In the Big12, they still lost but they belonged despite their feud with UT. In the SEC, no one will accept them as a rivalry. No one accepts them as a threat except Kentucky. They don't fit in here despite how hard they try yelling SEC in unison.

They pick and jab at everyone that doesn't ignore them just hoping to create that heated rivalry they so desperately deny with UT, but no one cares. No one will feud with them and it hurts them. All they have left to hand on to is the little brother syndrome.

They can't win, so they hang their hat on a top recruiting class of wide receivers while leaving holes in every other position on the field.

These little brothers will never stop looking up to you even long after you've forgotten about them.



Posted by atlau
Member since Oct 2012
5264 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

So you're saying because a team has won more games than Auburn, that makes Auburn a little brother?


quote:

Stan Gable

quote:

Yes, that's exactly how it works.


Teams Ranked By Total Wins
Team Total Wins %
Notre Dame 881 .734
Oklahoma 848 .720
Alabama 845 .715

quote:

Don't be stupid.


Don't see how I'm being stupid when you said it was based on number of wins

This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 12:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter