does that equal "kicking the shite out" of someone? no. you were the better team, clearly, but you didn't kick the shite out of them

41-7 is kicking the shite out of someone. losing the yardage battle 566 to 280 is getting the shite kicked out of.

winning the yardage battle by less than 100 and winning the game by 3 is not kicking the shite out of someone

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by cas4t

Member since Jan 2010

70981 posts

Posted on 10/27/14 at 10:19 am to beaver

Why do you care about semantics so much?

"Oh no a thread title isn't up to my standards so I'm going to whine about it until someone agrees with me"- beaver

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by im4LSU

Hattiesburg, MS

Member since Aug 2004

32201 posts

Posted on 10/27/14 at 11:04 am to beaver

quote:
You really think I care don't you?

quote:
If the other team should have taken it to OT (but they have an autistic child at QB), that's not kicking the shite out of someone

At some point a point differential does matter. No matter the stats, a 3 point win is not ever kicking the shite out of someone

ETA you're not kicking the shite out of someone if you turn it over 4 times

quote:
does that equal "kicking the shite out" of someone? no. you were the better team, clearly, but you didn't kick the shite out of them

41-7 is kicking the shite out of someone. losing the yardage battle 566 to 280 is getting the shite kicked out of.

winning the yardage battle by less than 100 and winning the game by 3 is not kicking the shite out of someone

Kinda looks like you care a little