Started By
Message

re: Post Evidence Regarding What Really Happened After MSST Went Up 34-10 Versus LSU

Posted on 10/27/14 at 8:55 am to
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2301 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 8:55 am to
quote:

If the game were played today, LSU would probably win.


Riiiight. You obviously haven't been paying much attention to both teams.

quote:

So think what you want, MSU's coaching staff wasn't playing backups....what you saw at the end is what should have been happening earlier in the game.


That's absurd. Not only was MSU playing third stringers, they were playing prevent D and running conservative offensive plays for minimal yardage.

MSU had the ball at the LSU 12 with 5 minutes to play, and the score 34-16. One score would have put the game away. Mullen made a huge error at that point (which he admitted) and put in the entire second string offense with Dak at QB. Second string makes no sense, and leaving Dak into play with the second string makes even less sense. They turned to ball over on downs.

Harris came in at QB, and State used a combination of 2nd and 3rd string players to play prevent defense. Very badly. Harris lead LSU to another TD, failed on the 2 point try, and the score was 34-22.

On MSU's next possession, Mullen again put in a collection of subs with Dak at QB. Muniz was at center. Muniz is a Senior who almost never plays. He plays on special teams, and sometimes gets in at the end of big blowouts. He snapped the ball over Dak's head and LSU recovered.

For the next defensive possession, MSU went back to its regular rotation of defensive players, but they were still playing prevent...3 man rush, 8 men back....and they still played it very poorly and gave up a quick TD. 34-29.

After recovering the onside kick attempt, MSU put the first string offense back in. But, they just ran 3 ultra conservative plays and had to punt, which set up LSU's final attempt at a comeback.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
24279 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 9:09 am to
quote:

That's absurd. Not only was MSU playing third stringers, they were playing prevent D and running conservative offensive plays for minimal yardage.


If they were playing prevent D, then Harris was even more successful because he TORCHED it. MSU ran all over LSU for most of the game even with conservative runs. LSU just happened to stuff them on 4th and 1 inside the LSU 5. If they were really being conservative, they would have kicked the FG, but they wanted the 1st down and the TD.
This post was edited on 10/27/14 at 9:11 am
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Riiiight. You obviously haven't been paying much attention to both teams.


Yes, yes I have. And I've seen Kentucky run right thru your defense like it wasn't there. And hat same offense couldn't get a first down against LSU.

Our defense is DRASTICALLY improved with injured players now contributing and the best MLB on our team finally getting the starts and improving us hugely.

Yes, he would be enough to stop many of those Dak runs...not all, Dak is damn good, but just "some" of the change the outcome of our contest.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter