Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M's 100 Year Decision to join the SEC
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:07 am to Cheese Grits
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:07 am to Cheese Grits
Mine was intended as a very short synopsis and was thus not comprehensive.
Your explanation is more-detailed and thus better. Thx
AS an aside, the Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association (SIAA) doesn't even seem to have been a "conference" in the modern sense. More like a "super-conference" or a mini/regional NCAA, which did not exist in anything resembling its current form until several decades later.
Also, TAMU did not "join" the SWC. It was a founding member.
Your explanation is more-detailed and thus better. Thx
AS an aside, the Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association (SIAA) doesn't even seem to have been a "conference" in the modern sense. More like a "super-conference" or a mini/regional NCAA, which did not exist in anything resembling its current form until several decades later.
Also, TAMU did not "join" the SWC. It was a founding member.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 9:24 am
1
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:23 am to AggieHank86
quote:
TAMU did not "join" the SWC. It was a founding member.
If you say so. After 100 years with a gay animal with no nuts TAMU is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Hostage is more like the truth and founding member is more like the rationalization. Good thing LSU and Ole Miss turned them down flat back then. Both are better for it. Hogs still have PTSD and it has been a generation since they got their freedom from that nonsense.
Just be glad you are now among friends who may kick you arse but will be decent enough to buy a beer afterwards.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News