Started By
Message
re: Richt Gets Response from SEC Officials
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:27 pm to UsnDawg
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:27 pm to UsnDawg
Let's face it. The refs sucked balls both ways.
1.Gurley should've had the personal foul when he headbutted our player, not us. At the very minimum, offsetting fouls. Y'all ended up scoring on drive when this happened on a 3rd down.
2.We had a phantom clipping call, after yall intercepted a ball. That's right...after. WTF? We aren't blocking for anyone then.
I agree with UGA fans that the refs sucked all around that game but it went both ways
1.Gurley should've had the personal foul when he headbutted our player, not us. At the very minimum, offsetting fouls. Y'all ended up scoring on drive when this happened on a 3rd down.
2.We had a phantom clipping call, after yall intercepted a ball. That's right...after. WTF? We aren't blocking for anyone then.
I agree with UGA fans that the refs sucked all around that game but it went both ways
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 4:28 pm
3
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:28 pm to Gamecox20
Can't really dispute that Gamecox20
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:29 pm to Gamecox20
quote:
1.Gurley should've been ejected when he headbutted our player and then threw two sissy, open hand slaps to our players faces
FIFY
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 7:14 pm to Gamecox20
quote:
2.We had a phantom clipping call, after yall intercepted a ball. That's right...after. WTF? We aren't blocking for anyone then.
The referee did not do a good job of explaining this penalty. But it is illegal for a defender to "chop" or take the legs out of a blocker. While I truly believe the SC player was making an attempt at a tackle and winds up having a UGA player fall over him, this is the rule that they were calling. So yes the penalty was called after the interception.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News