Started By
Message
re: Grade your starting units so far
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:28 am to Warrior Poet
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:28 am to Warrior Poet
Arkansas
QB: D (until proven better, which could be)
RB: A (only question is who will step up at FB)
WR: C (Good young talent, Wilson back, Hatcher stepping up)
TE: A (At worst Henry 2nd best in conf., Derby may surprise, Sprinkle bigger,)
OL: B+ (Only reason not an A is question at center)
DL: B (Flowers and Philon, need depth to step up)
LB: C (Could be much better, have to prove it)
DB: D (New coaching could help, but got to see it)
K: C (New highly rated kicker, but Hocker hard to replace)
P: B+ (Versatile R or L rugby style Aussie)
KR/PR: C (K Marshall on KO should be good, PR up in air)
Just the way I see things right now.
QB: D (until proven better, which could be)
RB: A (only question is who will step up at FB)
WR: C (Good young talent, Wilson back, Hatcher stepping up)
TE: A (At worst Henry 2nd best in conf., Derby may surprise, Sprinkle bigger,)
OL: B+ (Only reason not an A is question at center)
DL: B (Flowers and Philon, need depth to step up)
LB: C (Could be much better, have to prove it)
DB: D (New coaching could help, but got to see it)
K: C (New highly rated kicker, but Hocker hard to replace)
P: B+ (Versatile R or L rugby style Aussie)
KR/PR: C (K Marshall on KO should be good, PR up in air)
Just the way I see things right now.
This post was edited on 8/6/14 at 9:32 am
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News