Started By
Message

re: TAMU putting Louisiana in it's locker rm? (Pics link added)

Posted on 8/3/14 at 5:19 pm to
Posted by Aggball
Houston
Member since Jun 2014
640 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Why do A&M fans not understand that had we gotten Speedy, he would have always been behind Quinn and Dupre.


How many brain cells do you have to lose before you trealize that Dupre and Speedy are different positions? Just because it says "WR" by their names doesn't mean they are they same type of WR.

I'm done talking to stupid people.
Posted by Tigerdew
The Garden District of Da' Parish
Member since Dec 2003
13594 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

How many brain cells do you have to lose before you trealize that Dupre and Speedy are different positions? Just because it says "WR" by their names doesn't mean they are they same type of WR.

I'm done talking to stupid people.


They're not even close to the same type of WR. That's why it's extra stupid for anyone to argue over their ratings. Of course LSU wanted Speedy. However, it's not quite the loss that A&M wants to make us believe it is. We needed physical possession WRs more than anything in this class. Dupre, Quinn and Upchurch fit that mold. LSU doesn't rely heavily on the 1yd pass and yac to move the chains like A&M does. Speedy is perfect for that offense.
Posted by Skin
Member since Jun 2007
6370 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

How many brain cells do you have to lose before you trealize that Dupre and Speedy are different positions? Just because it says "WR" by their names doesn't mean they are they same type of WR.





That's why he included Quinn, who has locked up a starting spot in the slot.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter