Not sure how WM hasn't philosophically changed the offense with the hire of Roper. It is a 180 from Pease systematically.

The offense was abysmal in '12, but UF won games with a stout D. Not sure how you don't give a coach credit for winning 11, but then you want to give them full credit for the 8 losses the following year. Guess we agree to disagree there.

UF has made whole sale changes on the offensive side of the ball following 2 terrible years worth of production. If that isn't self evaluation by the HC, I don't know what is.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom

Member since Sep 2013

21146 posts

Posted on 8/2/14 at 9:30 pm to gatordmb89

quote:
The offense was abysmal in '12, but UF won games with a stout D. Not sure how you don't give a coach credit for winning 11, but then you want to give them full credit for the 8 losses the following year. Guess we agree to disagree there.

Eh, when your entire reason for winning is a defense that you didn't build -- but the reason you lose is an offensive "vision" you had I think that's the big difference.

Take Meyer with Zook personnel. He turned a team that was mediocre on offense and made it a monster and retained the defense.

We didn't really win on scheme, we won on holding on to dear God and hoping the other team didn't score. I said this last time: That can't last. We fooled people for the short term, but then once teams realized we couldn't retain possession they simply beat us at our own game.

Muschamp literally got outschemed by an FCS coach with more injured players than us.

He didn't really scheme anything the year before -- just leaned on the stacked defense he was left with.

2 ...

Report Post

Gator Sports Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board