LSU didn't get lucky in 2003. LSU beat the sh*t out of a top 5 UGA team in the SECCG in Atlanta when most people thought UGA would beat them. LSU had beaten them in a close one earlier in the season in Tiger Stadium, but many were still saying UGA was the better team. USC lost a game and didn't have a championship game playing in a soft conference (though they were a very good team). OU went undefeated in the regular season and didn't have a loss until their conference championship game. The system was only designed to handle so much. LSU held OU to just over 150+ total yards in the BCSCG and the OU offense was supposed to be one of the best ever with their Heisman QB. LSU's D was stacked and we've seen how Saban does in NC games.

quote:
Last but not least, there's LSU's 1959 national championship. Congrats on beating the #12 ranked team in your bowl game.

Did you just go back to 1959? Jesus... God Bless ya!

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Cumulonimbus

Alabama

Member since Jun 2014

623 posts

Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:40 am to Big EZ Tiger

If the 2005 BCS National Championship was any indicator, Oklahoma was a fraud. Seriously, what were the big difference between the 2003 and 2004 versions of USC and Oklahoma? During USC's run, it wasn't their fault that the PAC was weak. The system ultimately penalized them due to their conference affiliation. If the PAC was strong, they might have made a few more appearances.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board