Started By
Message
re: Malzahn's Offensive "Scheme"
Posted on 7/14/14 at 3:42 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 7/14/14 at 3:42 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
There is your answer.
I understand this. but you don't see the same type of derision towards Sumlin, for instance, and he has been pretty successful. Granted not as successful as some on the board would like, but he's had a couple of pretty good years.
I THINK it is because it is the HUNH and it is relatively new. That is why I talked about the wishbone, veer etc. They were all new at one time and thought to be relatively gimmicky.
I just don't think Malzahn gets the credit he deserves.
And no, I am not sucking up to Auburn...just trying to be fair and honest.
2
Posted on 7/14/14 at 3:48 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I just don't think Malzahn gets the credit he deserves.
It is because he is at Auburn. The Cam Newton saga changed everything with regards to Auburn. We joke about people being Aubsessed and what not, but after 2010, people love seeing bad news about Auburn. There is a reason that the Marshall citation was still at the top of espn the same day as Lebron's announcement. If Auburn is succeeding, there is an effort to discredit it. People don't give it credit because they don't want it to work.
Posted on 7/14/14 at 3:49 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
but you don't see the same type of derision towards Sumlin, for instance, and he has been pretty successful
A&M is new, Auburn is not.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News