Started By
Message
re: Realignment In A Nutshell
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:46 pm to SwatMitchell
Posted on 7/10/14 at 4:46 pm to SwatMitchell
Yup, it's fairly obvious.
Add a state that adds to SEC footprint and charge ~1.30 per TV set in that state.
Add a school in a state already in the SEC footprint...bring in 0 additional SECN revenue.
hmmmmm
Add a state that adds to SEC footprint and charge ~1.30 per TV set in that state.
Add a school in a state already in the SEC footprint...bring in 0 additional SECN revenue.
hmmmmm
1
Posted on 7/10/14 at 6:36 pm to BigD Ag
quote:
Yup, it's fairly obvious.
It's entirely obvious.
Plus there are two traditional southern states that do not yet represent the SEC, can you guess who?
at which point we can fully expect the new 4x4 conference format to take hold, so now the only real fun in speculation becomes pick -4
we know one has to be
UGA
Tenn
Bama
Aubie
leaving
USC
UF
NC school
Va school
Ole Miss
MSU
LSU
Aggie
Vandy
UK
Arky
Mizzou
this still leaves open the available annual cross div rival game, so UF can still play UGA every year, Tenn can play Vandy, Aggie can play Arky, etc.
ok now let the "but,,, but.,,, that's NO FAIR" whining begin..
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News