Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court rules in favor of Religious companies not covering contraception

Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Not that it makes it okay or not or anything like that. What it really does is set a precedent for future rulings.



The more I think about it, the more I dislike the ruling. More than anything, the court seems to be dictating which religious beliefs are acceptable in this country. The 91 case the SC rejected that paved the way for RFRA that this case was based on, had to do with Native Americans taking peyote. Alito made it a point to put in the opinion that things like blood transfusions don't apply, but there are religions that don't believe in blood transfusion. Vaccinations as well.
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35674 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:23 pm to
Spleen, take it to its logical conclusion. Faith healers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter