Started By
Message

re: The SEC East was not Down Last Year.......

Posted on 6/3/14 at 11:38 pm to
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27441 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

I don't really consider USC, Mizzou,


Thats the problem. Strength is relative. Just because it wasn't UF and UGA doesn't mean the East was down. If you all are just trolling, I get that play but if you are arguing from a logical standpoint, well, it just doesn't pass the test.

Im not using transitive property either. Im basing the assessment on the entire body of work as rated nationally.

A perfect example of a "down" year was 2010. The whole division was down. A 9 win team won the East and was the only ranked team in the division. There are other years where the division only had one ranked team.

Folks can ignore facts because of nostalgia and tradition, thats fine, no skin off my nose. Dont expect someone to take that opinion very logically or seriously when the facts fly in the face of that opinion.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 11:46 pm to
The final rankings were right. SC and Mizzou would have beaten bama 2 out of 3 times and LSU 3 out of 4.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29738 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 11:47 pm to
this decade the west has been a little stronger than the east

it was the other way around in the 90's

the swing will come back around
Posted by PortCityTiger82
Shreveport, LA
Member since Nov 2010
6564 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 11:49 pm to
It has nothing to do with what teams it is. Two teams does not make a strong east. Period.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter