Started By
Message

re: Division IV: Good Or Bad For SEC?

Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:43 pm to
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

and the AAC


You mean ACC? The AAC will not be in the Big 5. Also, I would not count the ACC in as an automatic SEC vote. They have a lot of high end academic schools to keep happy as well. There are more Duke's and UVA's in the ACC than FSU and Clemsons.
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 5:45 pm
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19277 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

You mean ACC? The AAC will not be in the Big 5. Also, I would not count the ACC in as an automatic SEC vote. They have a lot of high end academic schools to keep happy as well. There are more Duke's and UVA's in the ACC than FSU and Clemsons.


And I wonder what kind of enforcement system is being proposed and who gets to hand down the punishments?

This could set up as the latest case of Yankee states trying to dictate terms to the South.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 6/2/14 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

The AAC will not be in the Big 5


My bad...for some reason I thought in my brain the AAC would be involved as they were the Big East.

If the Big 12 can get back to 12 or even go up to 14 teams, I think we will be able to block most of this crap the Big Ten and Pac 12 tries to shove down our throat with the help of some schools from the ACC.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter