Started By
Message

re: South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?

Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

I would rather be in South Carolina's position post-Spurrier than Mizzou's post-Pinkel. Y'all are fricked when Pinkel hangs it up.



Please tell me why South Carolina will be in a better position post Spurrier than Mizzou post Pinkel...
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:37 pm to
It's simple really. Mizzou can't recruit, sell itself, for shite. PINKEL is the magic worker that takes the 3* and turns them into 3rd rounders. You, like all mizzou fans, think Mizzou is some great program so why can't y'all recruit better? Is it the inconsistency (12 win seasons followed by missing a bowl)?

I've heard many times that Pinkel is the best at doing more with less and "finding diamonds in the rough", y'all seem to pride yourselves on saying that. But after he leaves, who is going to coach all these 'underrated' guys up to SEC level?
Posted by Loathor
Columbia, SC
Member since Jun 2012
2369 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Please tell me why South Carolina will be in a better position post Spurrier than Mizzou post Pinkel...


More fertile recruiting grounds, better location, actually have interesting rivalries that we currently play on a yearly basis, proving that you can succeed Spurrier > who's Gary Pinkel... etc.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter