Started By
Message
locked post

So they ran a mock scenario for the upcoming playoff system and here is what ...

Posted on 5/25/14 at 11:40 am
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37993 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 11:40 am
.... here is what happened.

Looks suspect to me. From where did they pull the teams for the mock sample? Or is this a hint as to how they are thinking?

It's a long article:

LINK

College football's forthcoming Playoff might be preferable to its predecessor on paper, but in practice could remind why we can't have nice things.

Excerpted from above:

quote:


College Football Playoff executive director (and former BCS head) Bill Hancock met with gathered journalists Saturday morning at the annual Association for Women in Sports Media convention. Hancock appeared to provide a glimpse into the relative transparency of the new Playoff selection process.


We already had a pretty good idea of what the selection process will look like, but only from a high level. The Playoff committee members will meet on Mondays and Tuesdays to produce weekly rankings, beginning October 28, which will decide both the two Playoff games and the four other New Year's bowls.


The selection committee voting guidelines show the committee's general emphasis. How rigidly they're enforced and how much emphasis is placed on things like conference championships over record alone remains very open to debate. An entire controversy arose a month back when committee chair and Arkansas AD Jeff Long said it's not the "most deserving" teams... it's the "best."


Saturday, Hancock appeared to show a list of Playoff's selection committee's 2015 mock ...





Excerpted from above:

quote:


Ignoring some of the bolder projections (put down the pitchforks, #FSUTwitter), which would appear to be geared towards experimenting with some of the recusal guidelines, here's an educated guess on why the schools in the right hand column are grouped the way they are.

No. 1 seed Stanford, Pac-12 champions
No. 2 seed Michigan, Big Ten champions
No. 3 seed Duke, ACC champions
No. 4 seed Wisconsin, Big Ten runners-up

Florida, SEC champions
Clemson, ACC runners-up
Arizona State, Pac-12 runners-up
Oklahoma, Big 12 champions
Baylor, Big 12 No. 2
Oklahoma State, Big 12 No. 3
BYU, independent
Michigan State, Big Ten No. 3
San Diego State, best Group of Five
Georgia, SEC No. 2
Central Florida, Group of 5 No. 2



Continued here: LINK
Posted by 3andOut
League City, TX
Member since Jun 2013
3685 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 11:45 am to
So with this example we learn we will/can have 2 SEC teams in the 4 game playoff...

And they dont have to play each other in the Semis? This cant be right.
This post was edited on 5/25/14 at 11:46 am
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 11:50 am to
Yep Auburn and UGA will be going with only one loss to the other.

The rest of you are fricked!

Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
17590 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 11:51 am to
This i at.

quote:

Florida, SEC champions


quote:

Georgia, SEC No. 2
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 1:52 pm to
Lets take last year for example. SEC had 4 in the top 6 at one point, how do 2 not get in?
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20258 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 1:56 pm to
Duke
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59014 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Arkansas AD Jeff Long said it's not the "most deserving" teams... it's the "best."



Shows you how much I know. I was under the impression that the most deserving teams were the best teams.
Posted by BuccWildBammer
AL
Member since Nov 2011
23334 posts
Posted on 5/25/14 at 2:14 pm to
They have 2 SEC East teams and have UF winning the SEC
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter