re: Mizzou Admits They F*cked Up Sexual Assault Case of Student Athlete

quote:

---

But thats not how you entered this thread. You firmly implied that Anderson was told and lied about the contact between the two.

No matter how badly you want this to be on Mizzou and that they covered it up it isnt going to happen Grits. This song and dance is pathetic and now with the alter...come on.

---

I never said anything about a cover up by the University as a whole. I'm acknowledging the possibility that Anderson covered her own arse and the fact that her testimony contradicts the diary entry by a girl who committed suicide after being sexually assaulted.

On the one hand, you have two contemporaneous writings (Courey's diary entry and the therapist's notes) offering you proof that Courey reported the rape to Anderson.

On the other hand, you have Anderson's statement more than two years later, during an investigation concerning failure of one or more university employees to take proper action in response to a sexual assault report, that she does not recall being told about the rape.

If you were an unbiased, impartial observer asked to lend credence one way or the other (reported/not reported) which way would you lean? Which is the more probable scenario?

I get it, you are sensitive because there has been some bad news regarding Missouri in the last few days. This report isn't a vindication of Missouri. It is an indictment for failure to institute proper policies for handling/investigating a sexual assault at the very least, non-compliance with Title IX notwithstanding.