Started By
Message
re: What team leads the conference in Total Offense in 2014?
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:59 pm to All4Qtrs
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:59 pm to All4Qtrs
quote:
we are good then. considering last time we were matched up...
Whos returning more play makers on O? (serious ?)
It's not as simple as who returns, for example, MU doesn't return it's starting QB but will be better w/ Matty Football Mauk, the depth/recruiting we have at the handful of positions that have starters leaving is really outstanding.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:01 pm to Jagd Tiger
this thread sucks
and a&m is the answer
and a&m is the answer
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:05 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
Matty Football Mauk
ok back to business
it is when they are untested... they are a question mark and when making predictions you must remember:
1 its not real
2 never bet on improbabilities
3 examine the facts and remove personal opinions
i have based my "guess" off of returning starters and the proof they have brought to the table
Posted on 4/7/14 at 3:05 pm to Jagd Tiger
I don't know where the net result will put us, but I expect Mauk to probably put up bigger numbers all the way around. That's INT's as well as Yds or TD's.
Running back? No drop off. We used 3 guys equally last year and return 2 of them. The new 3rd guy will fit right in.
Lose some at WR but if we were deep anywhere, with a 5* not seeing much time last year, it was at WR. Add to it, I bet Mauk and DGB have more chemistry than Franklin did and I don't think we fall off at WR.
On the line, we move a couple guys around, but all 5 played last year.
Running back? No drop off. We used 3 guys equally last year and return 2 of them. The new 3rd guy will fit right in.
Lose some at WR but if we were deep anywhere, with a 5* not seeing much time last year, it was at WR. Add to it, I bet Mauk and DGB have more chemistry than Franklin did and I don't think we fall off at WR.
On the line, we move a couple guys around, but all 5 played last year.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News