Started By
Message

re: As a recruit.. Texas or Texas A&M

Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:58 am to
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Aggies lost the annual game with us from all the NCAA sanctions during the period they keep referring to as their glory years. 7 Years of NCAA sanctions, lack of institutional control in '88 and '94, 2 years of bowl bans, and a year of TV ban from the NCAA violations A&M committed between 1983-1992( LINK / ) is why we stopped the series. Those violations earned A&M the title of 3rd dirtiest program of all time title and combined with SMU's death penalty killed the SWC.


Its funny how people always bring up how many teams in the SWC from that period were under sanctions, and conveniently leave out how the NCAA infractions committee was controlled by a Texas grad. No conference has ever been so penalized for beating one team in the history of the NCAA. They even granted Texas retroactive immunity for all past infractions, known or unknown; a unique event in all of college sports.

Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:08 am to
Yup. The entire SWC was dirty, but the protection texas received was (and is) mind - boggling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter